Road and Road shoulders: Hidden unnecessary community infrastructure planning

In the tranquil enclave of La Cresta, the Property Owners Association's (POA) existing board of directors has taken steps that have sparked considerable debate and contention within the community. The decisions to invest resources into seemingly unnecessary community infrastructure projects, such as horse trails, horse crosswalks, and a new eye-catching pole sign, have raised questions about the alignment of these projects with the community's needs and preferences.

​

The Pole Sign Controversy

The installation of the pole sign, while intended to enhance visibility and identity, has generated criticism for a number of reasons. Residents argue that the sign's scale and design clash with the natural surroundings and aesthetic harmony that La Cresta values. Moreover, concerns have been voiced about the location of the sign at a high-traffic area, potentially compromising safety for both drivers and equestrians.

​

Questioning Priorities

The decisions regarding these projects have prompted homeowners to question the priorities of the current POA board. The horse crosswalks, for instance, have come under scrutiny due to their placement in areas with heavy traffic, leading some to wonder if they were planned without a thorough understanding of equestrian and road safety.

​

Community Engagement and Transparency

One of the prevailing concerns among La Cresta residents is the lack of community engagement and transparency in these decisions. Many feel that the board's actions were taken without adequately consulting homeowners or providing a clear rationale for the chosen projects. The absence of a robust feedback mechanism has led to feelings of frustration and disenfranchisement among those who oppose the developments.

​

Looking Ahead

As La Cresta continues to grow and evolve, it's imperative for the community's leaders to listen to and address the concerns of its residents. The decisions to invest in infrastructure projects should align with the values, practical needs, and aesthetic sensibilities of the community. Transparent communication and a thorough exploration of alternatives are crucial steps toward rebuilding trust between the board and the homeowners.

​

Conclusion

The recent decisions made by the current POA board of directors have cast a spotlight on the importance of responsible and well-considered community governance. The introduction of horse trails and crosswalks that don't meet the criteria of safety, as well as the controversial pole sign, have triggered a necessary conversation about the future direction of La Cresta. The road ahead involves a renewed commitment to community engagement, transparent decision-making, and a shared vision that respects the unique character and wishes of the residents.